Disclosure, Again: Why I’m Not Holding My Breath for Trump’s UFO File Release

The pattern behind the promises, the files, and the missing evidence.

President Donald Trump has announced that he intends to begin identifying and releasing federal files related to UFOs and so-called “alien” matters. Predictably, this has triggered a fresh surge of excitement. Once again, we are told that transparency is coming. Once again, people are wondering whether this will finally be the moment.

Sitrec - A free UAP analysis tool that I developed.

Let me be clear: if the U.S. government released solid, well-documented evidence of extraterrestrial visitation, I would be thrilled. It would be the most important scientific discovery in human history. Physics, biology, astronomy, philosophy—every field would be affected. We would not be arguing about blurry videos or ambiguous tales of radar returns. We would be engaging with a new and exciting reality that we are not alone.

But history gives us little reason to expect that outcome.

We’ve already been through several UFO “disclosure” cycles. Each one is framed as historic. The language is dramatic—secrets, programs, hidden truths. But if any material finally surfaces, it’s rarely transformative. We’ll see blurry, ambiguous videos, recycled stories from “credible people”, and pilot anecdotes without raw sensor data. The pattern is familiar: the buildup implies alien revelations; the release delivers circular stories and unresolved sightings supported by fragmentary evidence. The mystery remains—but not because a crashed saucer was confirmed. It remains because the data was never strong enough to resolve the case in the first place.

The creation of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) was supposed to centralize and clarify the issue. Its reports to date have not confirmed alien craft or reverse-engineering programs. They have documented sightings—some interesting, some unresolved—but nothing that crosses the evidentiary threshold into advanced technology, let alone extraterrestrial technology.

The same pattern holds with historical programs. Consider the hype around the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) and its association with Skinwalker Ranch. When the details emerged, what we saw was not hidden alien hardware, but a Pentagon-funded investigation that wandered into the paranormal. If anything, it was embarrassing—not revelatory. The “secret program” turned out to be less about crashed saucers and more about speculative research with little concrete output.

So when I hear that UFO files will be released, I apply the same standard I use to analyze any extraordinary claim: What is the data? What is the chain of custody? What independent corroboration exists? Are we looking at sensor artifacts, information fidelity and sufficiency issues, misinterpreted geometry, or genuinely novel physics?

So far, modern UFO enthusiasm has relied heavily on ambiguous material—short infrared clips, anecdotal testimony, and interpretations layered on top of limited data. Unidentified does not mean extraterrestrial. It means unidentified. The gap between those two words is enormous.

Politically, this sort of announcement is low-risk and high-reward. It signals openness. It energizes a segment of the public. It costs little upfront. Even if the released material contains nothing dramatic, the announcement itself generates headlines and attention.

That doesn’t mean nothing useful will come of it. More documents in the public domain can be valuable. Better videos would be amazing. Transparency is generally better than secrecy. Perhaps we will get better metadata, longer sensor sequences, or case files that allow for genuine technical analysis rather than speculation.

National security issues are likely to curtail much that is genuinely interesting. An object demonstrating what clearly seems like advanced technology is going to be interpreted first by the military as evidence of a foreign adversary, probably China, having developed something new. That information would naturally be classified.

As someone who analyzes UAP cases on a regular basis and developed Sitrec, a tool for recreating and inspecting UAP videos, I welcome more data. If better videos emerge, I’ll happily dissect them. If new documents surface, I’ll read them carefully.

But I am not holding my breath for alien bodies or revolutionary propulsion systems.

If extraordinary evidence exists, it will withstand scrutiny. Until then, I expect more noise than signal—and I’ll approach whatever is released the same way I always do: with open curiosity, and with skepticism.